In section Q 42 of the Law of Martyrdom (of 1984 of the), the defendants' special request for refusal to distribute the suit property to the plaintiffs on the basis that they had already paid the shares to the plaintiffs, both the courts In favor of the legal claim, the claimants did not dispute the fact that the property was ancestral but resisted the pretext that they had paid the shares to the plaintiffs, that it was with the defendants. Had become inevitable and necessary. The other legal heirs of the predecessor, with their free will and consent, decided to pay the sum of money in exchange for the shares in the interests and to pay the money so that the decisions below the two courts were in accordance with the law, because the parties had The theme was split. The real estate, which they inherited, remains valid in all four corners of the trial court law, property in dispute is divided into legal heirs that predate the interests of the parties, and any inappropriate, lower court decisions The rule was not malicious, illegal and the High Court refused to interfere with the factual inquiry based on the proper definition of evidence through the lower forums. Under the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
