Find a Lawyer

SHAFI MUHAMMAD versus STATE

In the appeal of section 302 (b) Criminal Code (v. 1898), section 4545 Q the legal heir of the victim was compromised and voluntarily granted the powers of any of whom, in the name of Allaah, The record did not exist. The interruption of the compromise or conviction of the accused by the trader under section 1111c, was reached by the parties when the PPC reached the compromised parties and accordingly the accused was acquitted.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010

• MURAD BAKHSH v. SENIOR MEMBER, B.O.R. BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA 2010 PLC(CS) 412
• SHOUKAT ALI v. FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION through Secretary 2010 PLC(CS) 455
• ZAFAR MASOOD v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN CIVIL SECRETARIAT, QUETTA 2010 PLC(CS) 563
• ABDUL QADIR v. NADEEM JAVED 2010 CLC 631
• RAHIM BAKHSH v. State 2010 PCrLJ 642
• Malik ZAHIR v. MUHAMMAD SALEEM 2010 CLC 642
• HABIB-UR-REHMAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 658
• Malik MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. MUHAMMAD QAHIR 2010 PCrLJ 666

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates email from Khair Pur Mir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes