Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH ITS MANAGER versus WASA THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR

After dismissing the appeal as default for Section 114 and AXLVII, R1 Review Illegal Prosecution, the Appellant / Applicant filed a petition for restitution of the appeal without filing a petition for defamation. The application was dismissed and eight months after the expulsion order, the review petition filed by the applicant was not eligible for review application where neither new nor significant issue or evidence was disclosed nor in the face of the record. In the present case there was neither any error or error on the face of the record nor was it shown A new and important case or evidence was discovered The applicant failed to make a case for review The request was rejected

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010

• Haji ABDULLAH v. KHURASAN 2010 PCrLJ 1308
• MUHAMMAD YAQOOB v. ABDUL AZIZ 2010 MLD 1316
• Haji HASSAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1326
• SIRAJUDDIN v. Haji MUHAMMAD ZARIF 2010 MLD 1333
• ABDUL HALEEM v. Syed AHMED ALI GILANI 2010 MLD 1363
• IMTIAZ SHAH v. State 2010 MLD 1424
• JALIL KHAN DOTANI v. DAWOOD AHMED 2010 CLC 1434
• BIBI SHAH GUL v. SAADIA 2010 CLC 1440

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2010 →

ask a advocate free from Tando Jam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes