Find a Lawyer

HAJI HASSAN versus STATE

Section 302/34 Qatl e amd Definition of evidence The complainant and other prosecution witnesses are not eyewitness witnesses, their evidence cannot be believed that the extra-judicial confession of the co-accused before the prosecution's testimony is a crime, as it is was not. Another strong piece of evidence brought to the record by the certified prosecution did not conclude that the chain of events was linked to each other to prove the accused's guilt and that the evidence of the prosecution was not disputed. Through the defense in the examination, the prosecution failed to prove the accused beyond reasonable doubt, the latter decision was set aside for not being lawful and the accused was acquitted of the charges. And they were released.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010

• NASIR HAYAT v. Syed QAMAR RAZA RIZVI 2010 CLC 1261
• ABDUL NASIR v. BIBI JANATORA 2010 CLC 1293
• Haji ABDULLAH v. KHURASAN 2010 PCrLJ 1308
• MUHAMMAD YAQOOB v. ABDUL AZIZ 2010 MLD 1316
• SIRAJUDDIN v. Haji MUHAMMAD ZARIF 2010 MLD 1333
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through its Manager v. WASA through Managing Director 2010 CLC 1343
• ABDUL HALEEM v. Syed AHMED ALI GILANI 2010 MLD 1363
• IMTIAZ SHAH v. State 2010 MLD 1424

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2010 →

criminal advocate from Mangla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes