Section 2 302 (b) definition of power Definition of evidence A special motive was emphasized for the commission of the crime, the accused claimed a previous rivalry between himself and the victim's brothers, who was the complainant who had given him The case was falsely implicated; two brothers who appeared as prosecution witnesses recorded their statement, no such proposal was made to them even though it was alleged that the accused had done so, While the location was also allegedly identified, the crime weapon was investigated by the investigating authorities before the police. Recovery was not disclosed, although its value was low, but eyewitnesses to the incident had been fully involved in the crime, the accused, there was no contradiction between the statements of the witnesses. It can be inferred that there was sufficient evidence against the accused during the court trial to involve him in the commission of the crime, the trial court barred the accused from presenting evidence in his defense. The material held was properly reviewed and came to the correct conclusion that the accused had failed to establish a basis on which to interfere. A decision was already taken by the trial court, no further reduction was required in the case. It was alleged that it failed to present the case in its favor, the decision of the trial was retained.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
