A. XXXVII, Rr 2 and 3 Order for defending leave on application for receipt of suit money, with order to provide guarantee for suit amount, with instructions to offer reliable security for suit amount. The defendant was allowed / requested to amend the order to the extent that the trial court refused to accept that the defendant was at his discretion. The objections / claims made were submitted to the trial court under OLXXII, R3 (2). ), CPC, either to grant leave to defend the case unconditionally, or subject to certain conditions, granting security was one of those conditions, to the extent that the trial court submitted security in this case. Had the power to demand and there was nothing illegal in the order to the extent that the trial court ruled that the defendant's powers were unreasonable, that any law requiring furniture to be presented Was not justified. Competent security; and this court conditionally abused its discretion by discharging the defendants had nothing special in their conduct, and they were not guilty of any illegal or irregular conduct in arbitrary conduct by the trial court. And failed to identify any kind of illegality at trial. It rejected the request made by the defendant to reduce the amount of bail, the trial court exercised its discretion properly, and the defendant filed a lawsuit in his favor.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
