CHIEF JUSTICE OF PAKISTAN IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY versus PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY
Articles 209 (7) and 184 (3) of the Constitution under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution require a judge to exercise his judicial powers by the Chief Justice of Pakistan and to impose sanctions imposed on him by the constitutional effect. Prevent exclusion. Even temporary interference with the office of Chief Justice or Judge, even when he was not suspended but was actually appointed to another judicial office, would remove his office from office / any constitutional, legal and The Legislature had no duty to recognize any inherent, sub or incidental powers with the delegated authority which has the potential to suspend or prevent the work, the term of the Chief Justice of Pakistan guaranteed by the Constitution. The Chief Justice of Pakistan cannot be suspended or prevented from exercising judicial powers attached to his post. In the exercise of certain, inherent, sub, implicit or implied powers, the President does not allow the Constitution to restrict the exercise of judicial powers by a judge or during the proceedings pursuant to Article 209 of the Constitution. No restriction is allowed on him as a judge nor does the Constitution give him any subordinate legislative authority. He said that the objective is to temporarily incapacitate the judge from removing his constitutional and governmental responsibilities, and in the present case, the order of the constitution was not allowed by the president. The tool to remove the Chief Justice of Pakistan from the scene to make way for the appointment of Acting Chief Justice of Pakistan, the Constitution did not authorize anyone, including the President,
