Section 149 Court Fees Reduction Appeal filed by the Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed by the Supreme Court on the ground that the reduction of judicial fees was not fulfilled in the time given by the court and the readers of the court were not authorized. To increase the time they have to appear in court. Applicants regarding the legality of the fee did not violate the target date nor did the appellate court order, which in the absence of the presiding officer on the one hand and the reader's direction on the other hand, comply with Could not have been made which stated that the court fee was to be submitted on the next date. All that was given by the reader about the hearing was that the court fee was to be submitted to the duty judge. If there was a duty judge, the readers themselves would not be given a date and the case would usually be adjourned. Where the Presiding Officer was brief. Leave for a day or two, no duty judge was appointed, and in criminal cases for the purposes of remand, additional duties were assigned to another Judicial O. In the specific circumstances of this case, the court had a valid filing date, nothing was available to support the duty judge working that day, nor did they have the applicant's conduct controversial. Can be given. The court intentionally acted with intent to defy the orders. The Supreme Court changed the appeal for leave to appeal and remanded the case to the lower appellate court for an appeal decision, an appeal allowed.
