Sections 5A and 13 (6) of the rent control order have been directed to the tenant to submit past and future rent as per the due date. The tenant's act of attacking the tenant's defense in failing to comply with such order is that the tenant has no jurisdiction to collect the rent at a timely manner. The tenant's accuracy duty was restricted by the section 5A of the West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance, 1959, for the tenant to increase the rent, irrespective of whether under section 13 (6). Over time, rent control became prohibited. This ordinance may provide a way to submit permanent increased rent when the tenant has a reservation on such order, and may protest in front of the rent controller, but to comply with such order. Not refusing to pay the rent later or committing a default, but only after complying with such order can the tenant. Expressing his reservation to the tenant for final determination, they claim that their dismissal cannot be directed because there is no D. The landlord's claim and the landlord's claim became time-barred. The eviction proceedings cannot be questioned simply because the fixed rent was made part of the rent for the time being, therefore, to be withdrawn under the ordinance. The application could not be sustained when such an order was approved and after that, the tenant did not express his reservation, but did not comply with it after the expiry of the specified time.
