Section 2 302 (b) / Q 34 did not appeal to the wise to follow the testimony of the deceased before witnesses to the evidence in the case, because of their contrary nature. About 26 people were injured in indiscriminate firing and fire of about 100 rounds at the site of the incident, with no reports of Kalashnikov being reported anywhere. The complaint against the complainant was motivating, but it did not appear to have been hurt, despite the range of ocular witnesses shooting the accused. The ocular testimony at the scene of the incident was inherently flawed, neither valid nor reasonable, nor was there any exception, where statements of interested witnesses could be accepted without emphasis. The case was also lacking, although in the case of the accused's fugitive, it may not be used as a controversial piece of evidence, which had to be read with a piece of evidence and not in proportion to the proportionality of the ocular account. The disbeliever was acquitted under circumstances
