Articles 12 and 12 of the Law of Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 17 and 79, the contract for the sale of proof of misrepresentation and non-recourse, which was decided by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff and the Decree High Court. Failure to disclose correct plaintiff misconduct and read evidence by non-High Court, disregarding the record or High Court's agreement to sell the misuse of the law in full, with great diligence and analysis. Including the entire evidence to be recorded, so that their reasonable judgment can be recorded. His witnesses appearing in court failed to be discharged by the female owners for the execution / signing of the contract when the plaintiff's witnesses examined the Chief of Staff in their inspection that the agreement was signed and the thumb was marked by a lawyer himself. Were given and there is no reason. Interference in High Court Appeal decision dismissed \ r \ n
