Find a Lawyer

RAHAT ALI versus STATE

Section 4 Kid4 kidnapping or kidnapping for murder The accused accused of witnessing a weapon equipped with deadly weapons and his aides abducted his parents for a month's silence, not appeal intellectually. The absence of any comprehensible explanation in this regard has led to the prosecution's case being severely delayed by reporting the matter to the police and recording the statements of witnesses by the police. The statement of the witness was not credible and there is no other evidence linking the accused to the removal. The commission of the crime was available on record and the accused was acquitted

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• THE STATE/ANTI-NARCOTIC through Director-General Petitioner v. RAFIQ AHMAD CHANNA 2010 SCMR 580
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector v. MUHAMMAD FAROOQ 2010 PLD 582
• ABDUL KHALID v. PROVINCE OF SINDH 2010 SCMR 583
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. LAHORE HIGH COURT through Registrar 2010 PLC(CS) 584
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. RAHIB 2010 PLD 585
• VICTOR ELECTRONICS APPLIANCES INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2010 CLD 585
• ABDUL KAREEM v. State 2010 SCMR 589
• KHALID RASHID v. KAMRAN LASHARI, Chairman, C.D.A., Islamabad 2010 SCMR 594

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kakul lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes