Section 2302 (b) Qatil Im evidence Examination of evidence Increase in conviction The presence of both eye witnesses, closely related to the deceased, was not open to any serious exceptions to the dying at the time of the incident near the home of the deceased. Eyewitnesses were independent witnesses to the incident and had no motive or intention to induce the accused to commit malicious crime after rescuing the real killer of his loved one, unless the witnesses were accompanied by the victim. My relationship did not come to an end unless they were established with them. Disgust with the accused, which was not the case in the present, did not require any co-operation to relieve the convicted ocular witness and accordingly the accused's conviction was upheld. One of the disappointments and because of which he expressed carelessness is that even a small repetition with a human life, the dead, is made against a backdrop of enmity between them. The suspect came to the scene after armed himself with firearms and was shot near the victim's neck by a nearby Rangers; the incident was a planned crime committed by the accused, to justify any sympathy. There was nothing available on the record, the sentence of life imprisonment was increased to a charge of modesty or privileged treatment for the accused.
