Section 39 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 44 and 120 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 11 Suite for Sale Cancellation Agreement for Sale Agreement executed on 23 5 1956 and sale deed by the plaintiff in 189 1956. During enrollment. 20 7 In 1972, the defendant's case for filing a minor case was banned because the plaintiff was obliged to file the same case within three years from the date of his attaining majority under Article 44 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Where the sale agreement was signed by a natural guardian. Or if a guardian is appointed by a court, the minor may have the right to question his validity within three years under Article 44 of the Limitation Act, 1908, where a sale contract by a minor is made during his minority. Was implemented, then such transactions can be rationalized and challenged within reason. In the history of the implementation of such documents as being trivial, he was not eligible for a contract when the minor received knowledge of it as important. We have, both such documents, void, of suit land. The mutation in the series was recorded in 1972; the plaintiff filed the case on 20-20 1972, after it became important to know about the transfer of land through so many variables, that the case in this case was dismissed. Was done.
