Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN ALIAS PAPPU versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Qutel Ahmed, there was no enmity with the complainant and other witness who reviewed the evidence. There was no need for collusion. Acular evidence was supported The knife recovered from the suspect was found stained with human blood. The accused never reacted on the spot, he went to his house and found sufficient time to cool down the accused was not cool and the occasion. He returned to the gun while he was armed with a knife, intermittently, such murder was a murder in cold blood and he deserved the death penalty.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• KHAN MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 SCMR 1029
• MEHMOOD HUSSAIN LARK v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED 2010 SCMR 1036
• ISHTIAQ MASIH v. State 2010 SCMR 1039
• Mehr MANZOOR HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMMAD NAWAZ 2010 SCMR 1042
• NAZIR HUSSAIN v. MUSHTAQ AHMAD 2010 PLD 1048
• Haji MUHAMMAD BOOTA v. MEMBER (REVENUE) BOR 2010 SCMR 1049
• KASHIF AMIR v. State 2010 PLD 1052
• MUHAMMAD NAEEM INAYAT v. State 2010 SCMR 1054

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

best law firm from Upper Deval lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes