Section 42 of the Contract Act (72 of 1872 of IX), Sections 186 and 187 of the plaintiff's jurisdiction in the settlement of the plaintiff's jurisdiction without the written authorization of the wife (1/2) by the parties to the ownership of the half-suit Claiming a dispute for a dispute between the wife is denied, the trial evidence is for sale, the defendant and her husband refuse to sell the affidavit as a witness and reject the statements of the defendants and jirga members. It is alleged that this sale document was executed after the plaintiff's husband. The plaintiff's special counsel in his full knowledge and coincidence of the sale price states that the women in Pathan society never sit in the jirga, but rather that their brother / father / husband is the special counsel of the trusted plaintiff. The husband had to bear all the expenses of the house. That the husband and wife lived in the same house and they consulted with each other regarding their household affairs. And the plaintiff had a good relationship with her husband while she had a good relationship with her husband. On the evidence it has been proved that there is an affiliated agency in favor of the husband which allowed him to deal with the defendant in relation to the suit land and the plaintiff participates in the jirga. r \ n
