Find a Lawyer

SYED KAMAL SHAH versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

Articles 3 and 5 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) absence of any leave service The final inquiry into the fact that the authority of a civil servant of the Supreme Court has been absent from office and despite the best efforts of the department I did not join. The order, which was approved by the competent authority, was rejected by the appellate authority, which was also confirmed by the service tribunal, after the three authorities reviewed the evidence on record. ? The finding of the facts listed against the public servants by all employees cannot be interfered with by the Supreme Court while exercising the powers under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution. Government employee fails to raise any question about law Constitution Leave 212 (3) Appeal denied was denied

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• MUHAMMAD SAEE v. Mst. SHARAF ELAHI 2010 SCMR 1358
• Haji LIBAS KHAN v. Mst. NASEEM AKHTAR 2010 SCMR 1362
• KHALIQDAD KHAN v. Mst. ZEENAT KHATOON 2010 SCMR 1370
• MANZOOR HUSSAIN v. SHAHADAT KHAN 2010 SCMR 1375
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN v. Syed HASSAN ALI SHAH 2010 SCMR 1381
• ANWAR-UL-HAQ v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES AND PRODUCTION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2010 SCMR 1386
• REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD NAVEED HASHMI 2010 SCMR 1392
• CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE v. NAWAB KHAN 2010 SCMR 1399

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

top advocate from Mithi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes