OXXVI Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188 Reviewing the decision of the Supreme Court, the scope petitioner filed a review petition in which an attempt was made to review the decision passed by the Supreme Court if the court consciously and deliberately decides a matter. In accordance with the fact or law of the litigation, the request for review will not be competent. The review request was not inadmissible, where neither new nor significant misrepresentation was made, nor could any error appear on the face of the record. The question may be in error, but the condition was an example that it floats itself clearly on the surface and Asb do not require extensive discussion and action to deal with and was not intended for re-hearing of the case and the scope of the review was always extremely limited and confined to the main aspect of the case. The decision that was considered at the review stage if the decision considered the grounds taken in support of the revision application and in my interest in justice, justice and fair play, the decision of the Supreme Court to review the decision. I re-examined the matter, keeping in mind the principles. Article 188 of the Constitutional Applicant failed to bring the case within the parameters set by the Supreme Court in its decisions; the Supreme Court did not find any deficiency or illegality in the decision, therefore, refused to review the decision.
