FOOD DEPARTMENT, GUJRANWALA versus GHULAM FARID AWAN
The delay in Article 185 (3) of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 5, was granted a 39-day ban on leave application for appeal filed by the Principal Administrative Deferred Government Agency. The legal status of various officers was timely stopped by the government agencies, and it was possible that such requests could be restricted or illegally concealed, with the absence of the relevant officers / officials. Filed to stop attention and carelessness. The system and the Supreme Court neither praised such tactics nor gave public employees equal priority in front of the courts, nor showed any preferential treatment to government agencies, usually calling for humiliation of administrative delays. I was invited, which is not explained in good reason or in a reasonable way. Grounds for attaching any weight or credibility are in fact a concern for crime and neglect of the people concerned, thus further complicating administrative administrative inefficiencies and lack of decision-making in government offices. It was a legal obligation for individuals to explain the delay of each day and to show their alertness. Avoid the delay that effectively rendered the valuable remedies mentioned in the petition for delay, no plausible explanation of the cause of the delay could not be revealed, therefore, the Supreme Court refused to delay. The Supreme Court directed under the Attorney General and the Advocate Generals and the Law Officers to ensure that their respective governments are properly functioned to avoid harm.
