In addition to the R8 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Section 47 (3) Civil Service Appointment and Development Respondent, who was initially appointed as Assistant Lineman at B3. Selection grade B7 was promoted, but after seniority was changed, the Superintendent Engineer withdrew the respondent's promotion order and the appellant was promoted and ordered in his place. It was ordered to recover the financial benefits which led to the receipt of a refund order. The service tribunal was restored to its position by way of an undisclosed order and the respondent's order to reverse it, and the recovery of that amount was badly deleted by the Order of Service Tribunal on the basis that the defendant. The defendant's basic appointment as a lineman was illegal because he did not meet the required qualifications. And also because the post of Assistant Lineman was not publicized, the Appellant and the Respondents were appointed as Assistant Linemen by an order which had largely proved that in the knowledge of the Appellant. There was an order from the first day, but they did not challenge the order at any stage, which reached the final and could not happen. The controversial respondent was older in the appeal phase and was also appointed as Assistant Lineman through Rule 8 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servant (Rules of Service) Rule 1977, which clarified. In the case of interstate, direct recruitment and promotion, the promoter will give senior status even if the respondent
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2010
