Find a Lawyer

SAFDAR JABBAR versus GENERAL TYRE AND RUBBER CO. THROUGH MANAGER

The applicant's case for transfer of the complaint to another court (41 (55)) was dismissed before the Labor Court and the defendants also began their evidence, and if not more time wasted. The matter is likely to be decided eventually. There was no valid reason to move this case to another court, while the parties had to appear with the notice during the transfer and the court could call R&S from the original court where it was nearing completion, If there is an uproar with a party. After the original court decision, he had the right to appeal before the tribunal before r come n

Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 2010

• MUSHTAQ AHMED v. HABIB OIL MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED 2010 PLC 407
• AFTAB MEMON, DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.VI and 11 2010 PLC 415
• ASGHAR ALI v. CHAIRMAN, STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI 2010 PLC 221
• ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.V through Presiding Officer 2010 PLC 223
• DADABHOY CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED through Attorney v. PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.V 2010 PLC 231
• UNIVERSAL LEATHER (PVT.) LIMITED through Notified Manager v. SHUMAIL KHAN 2010 PLC 233

All Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh judgments of 2010 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gujar Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes