Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMED versus HABIB OIL MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED

Section (55 ()) ()) Counsel for the Transfer of Complaints The parties addressed the Tribunal on two matters, namely, the amendment request and the transfer request, and they had arrived at the conclusion that the Tribunal Counsel for the parties Part of the order was created. Applicant should be treated with reinstatement, as soon as the preliminary labor court orders are processed and domestic inquiries are completed within 30 days, the Labor Court's decision on waist benefits was left open, The employer may appoint an employee. The applicant will be reinstated within three days for the officer inquiry and will be taken under the final orders of the Labor Court, as soon as possible to decide the case.

Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 2010

• ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.V through Presiding Officer 2010 PLC 223
• SAFDAR JABBAR v. GENERAL TYRE AND RUBBER CO. through Manager 2010 PLC 225
• DADABHOY CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED through Attorney v. PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.V 2010 PLC 231
• UNIVERSAL LEATHER (PVT.) LIMITED through Notified Manager v. SHUMAIL KHAN 2010 PLC 233
• AFTAB MEMON, DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.VI and 11 2010 PLC 415
• ASGHAR ALI v. CHAIRMAN, STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI 2010 PLC 221

All Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh judgments of 2010 →

best law firm from Kasur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes