DADABHOY CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED THROUGH ATTORNEY versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.V
Section 55 (4) Salary Payment Act (IV of 1936), Section 15 amended applicant's lawyer's claim that he had not taken notice, so the Commissioner's Workers' Compensation, Authority and Labor heard. no. On the other hand, the court's position on the defendant's counsel was that under the law, the required amount was not submitted to the applicant before the authorities, however, the applicant's lawyer submitted a cross check in the name of the commander, Because of that, they were totally there. And the matter of justice was appropriate before the Authority for remand for fresh judgment under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, which would give the parties the opportunity to hear them for a fair hearing and decide whether the actual payment was paid by the applicant. Should go If the defendant is found within reasonable limits, the defendant will be paid the same and the matter may be closed. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Sindh, 2010
