RAFIQUE AHMED versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, KARACHI
Section 3, 5, 6 and 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), after dismissing Section 4 of the service of the appellant, he was discharged from duty after issuing show cause notices along with statements of the charges, Regular department inquiry was sent to the appellant through In response to the showcase notice, the allegations against them were denied and it was said that the facts were investigated before the approval of the anonymous order, but no formal inquiry was made. The appellant also submitted that no documentary evidence was provided to the appellant on the basis of which undesired action was taken. The counsel appearing for the authorities has no objection, if the case is remanded to the authorities for regular investigation of the case, with the consent, the authorities will be required to file the de novo action against the appellant under remand. And made the decision. Within four months the appellant was ordered to be reinstated on the case
Related judgments — Federal Service Tribunal, 2011
