KHURSHEED AHMED versus GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
The representation for the Section 4 Basic Pay Scale and the Increment Appellant's Grant, in favor of the service tribunal decision, was passed in favor of the co-employee under which it was granted BPS 15, since the approval of the co-employee, BPS. A petition was filed for a grant of 15. To obtain a Master's Degree, such pay scale and three advance increments which have been denied representation, the Appellant has already appealed before the Service Tribunal decision rendered by the Service Tribunal in favor of the co-employee. Was filed when the Supreme Court will remain up to the Supreme Court as reported in the SCMR 1185 of 1996. Observed that if the service tribunal or the Supreme Court would decide a law of the law relating to the terms and conditions of a public servant, which covers not only the cases of public servants, but also those of other public servants. Can also be covered by those who could not accept them. In such a case, the rule and rule of any legal proceeding demanded that the service tribunal / Supreme Court's decision be taken advantage of. Can be extended to other public servants who cannot be a party to litigation. The appellant was directed to BPS 15 and the appellant will be allowed three additions in which the petitioner has prayed for the date of arrears. To earn a master's degree, \ r \ n
Related judgments — Federal Service Tribunal, 2011
