Find a Lawyer

UNITED BANK LIMITED PENSIONERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRESIDENT versus UNITED BANK LIMITED THROUGH PRESIDENT

Article 199 Constitutional petition for constitutional petition was filed against the bank, which was not a person in the sense of Article 199 of the Constitution Bank, was not performing any duties in relation to the affairs of the Federation, the province or any of the banks. There were no employees of the legislative body, no writ could be issued against a bank petition by a person operating under the laws, and it was not known whether the applicant (association) was present or not, because the Constitution The request was not filed anywhere. Disqualification was not manageable, in the circumstances

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2011

• SALEEM ULLAH KHAN v. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL QURESHI alias ISMAIL QURESHI RECTOR 2011 PLC(CS) 756
• Major (Rtd.) NADEEM UDDIN KHALID v. BUSHRA BEGUM 2011 YLR 765
• FAZAL ABBAS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Housing and Works,Islamabad 2011 PLC(CS) 778
• SHABNAM ASHRAF v. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD through Chairman 2011 CLC 814
• MUNEER KHAN v. UZMA UFAQ 2011 CLC 846
• NAEEM SARWAR v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION AABPARA, ISLAMABAD 2011 MLD 847
• MASROOR HUSSAIN v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD 2011 CLC 851
• IMRAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 865

All Islamabad judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocates phone number from Dera Nawab Sahib lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes