MAJOR (RTD.) NADEEM UDDIN KHALID versus BUSHRA BEGUM
Section 17 and 21 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application was granted by the rent controller on termination of the lease and termination of the lease agreement on the basis of personal use and occupancy of the tenant and the vacant possession of the tenant was given to the landlord. Delivery was directed. The rent controller was retained by the appellate court with no evidence to prove that the lease agreement, which had been in operation for three years, was extended, After the expiry of the period determined by the lease agreement, the tenant lost the right to continue possession or the right to rent, in such cases, under section 17 of the Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance, 2001, on the land To evict a tenant, no one will be affected, but evidence about the personal use and occupancy of the landlord also prevails. With could not succeed. The adjudicatory rent controller had, in the circumstances, no choice but to enable the landlord to grant, with the appellate court correctly agreeing to the rental controller's finding and Retaining the order of eviction, the High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 disclosed only strong legal points or unlawful clarifications, which did not appear on the face of the record. In this case, the verdict of the case was a major deterrent and the constitutional application was dismissed
