Find a Lawyer

JUNAID KHAN versus STATE

Sections 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 411/34 of a convicted and illegally obtained stolen property were imposed on suspicion of grantee's suspicion and that too three days after the incident. There was no basis for denial of bail, whether to submit an invoice later or the commencement of the trial, otherwise, if the accused was found to be entitled to the exemption of bail prima facie, no case was filed against the accused. Was released, under the circumstances

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2011

• WACKENHUT PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. v. Malik ZAFAR IQBAL AWAN 2011 PLC 196
• SAJJAD HUSSAIN v. ARIF IBRAHIM 2011 PLC 206
• SAJJAD HUSSAIN v. ARIF IBRAHIM 2011 PLC 206
• Homoeopathic Doctor MUHAMMAD ZAHIR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Health, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad 2011 CLC 427
• SHIFA INTERNATIONAL HOSPITALS LTD. through Chairman and C.E.O. v. PAKISTAN MEDICAL AND DENTAL COUNCIL (PMDC) 2011 CLC 463
• Raja YASIR RAFIQUE v. State 2011 PCrLJ 491
• MUHAMMAD WASIM KIANI v. State 2011 PCrLJ 532
• KABIR AZAD v. State 2011 MLD 533

All Islamabad judgments of 2011 →

top advocates from Kacha Khooh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes