Sections 497 (2) Prevention of Electronic Crime Ordinance (VIII of 2009), Sections 7, 8, 9, 15, 19 and 20 Electronic Transaction Ordinance (LI of 2002), Sections 36 and 37 Electronic Fraud and Fraud, Electronic Misuse of the system or electronic device, shaming, abetting, assisting or attempting to commit a crime, etc., breach of confidentiality of information and damage to information systems, etc. There was no case under the bail, Electronic Investigation Prevention Ordinance, 2009 or Electronic Transaction Ordinance 2002 to approve further investigations. The accused was allegedly sent an e-mail message to the complainant that he had won the lottery and transferred some amount accordingly to pay 7% of the lottery complainant's total amount on the basis of fake letter. Was made and an agreement was made between the complainant. And the two other suspects were executed, even if the charge was accepted, it would not mean that the accused had illegally accessed the documents, records or destroyed anyone's information system. The alleged crime provider was not related to the laws of telecommunications. It can be said that this is a case of simple fraud and misrepresentation. The accused was not charged under the relevant provisions of the law, even under the alleged provisions of the law, the entire amount was not sent to the accused and this The allegation was that the money was actually sent. Misunderstanding, the evidence will require the accused's case, in these circumstances, was one of the inquiry, the accused was released on bail, in the circumstances
