OI, R 10 & O IX, R 13 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 Suites For specific performance of the contract of sale, the order of ex parte proceedings passed on 8 2 2005 and non-submission 16 3 In 2010, the ex parte decree was issued. The defendant's legal heritage appealed to the defendant against the former party decree alleging that the plaintiff had been missing since September 2004, requesting the plaintiff that such legal heirs were not parties to the case. Are. And that the trial court dismissed the request of a legal heir to retain it, which was upheld by the High Court in review. It shows that the appropriate FIR regarding the disappearance of the defendant was filed in the police station and the matter was pending before. The Apex Court will have a negative impact on the appellant's imposition of a decree because of the legal heirs of the suspects along with the other missing persons. The appellant has no decision to challenge the disqualification order, usually leave of appeal to persons who, although not subject to the action of the parties. It was approved by the judgment / decree and could not invade the applicant by refusing such application which could not attack its accuracy in other proceedings, if its rights In the affirmative, the remaining resident appellants did not file such applications and are being badly affected as legal heirs. The former person can be appealed against the order by not having an alternative alternative to the H igh Court.
