JEEA TEXTILES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD versus COLLECTOR, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, FAISALABAD
Section 7, 10, 11, 33, 45 and 46 Refund Claim Input Tax / Refund, Section 11 (2) of the Sales Tax Act 1990 and Section 33 (11) (A) of the Act Assistant Collector. C) cannot be dismissed because of the preventive action taken under s. The notice rejected the version of the Assisi and refused to return the input tax return to the collector (appeals), although the assessee was granted partial relief, but the claim for refund to some extent was rejected and This limit was actually approved by the assistant collector. There was no evidence in the notice of justification that the input tax was not submitted because no supplier audits were made but the percentage increase for the price increase to produce the demand without any prejudice. There can be no increase in the price on the basis of the estimation of the cause, the department's action against the sales tax act, the express section of 1990, the price increase was against the law, but the objections to the revenue, including certain observations. Invoice was deemed to be forfeited under section 7 (2) (i) of some Sales Tax Act, 1990, in connection with the transfer of goods. The objection was raised and the legal objections were brought to light as well as the fact that the material claimed by some was suspicious, with the Tribunal ordering a fresh and clear show cause notice to be issued. Was canceled
