MRS. FARIDA HANIF versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INTERIOR AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD
Section 54 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 115 Date of Correction The plaintiff seeks confirmation of his date of birth by verifying his computerized national ID card. Both courts failed to appreciate the fact that the plaintiff's passport was renewed by competent authorities. On more than three occasions and the relevant issuing authority had not raised any objection to its date of birth, the plaintiff's date of birth, forged and forged in the passport issued by the UK Government as well as for Pakistan. The counterfeit or the claimant did not. Do not file a case for negligent or unusual reasons Plaintiff was not claiming any right in any of the services, nor would it negatively affect any of the rights of any other person, in the history of the birth. There may be a burden on the treasury. In any way, the plaintiff was a citizen of Pakistan and had the right to obtain a computer readable Pakistani passport and, therefore, was entitled to correct the error in which he had entered his computerized national ID card from 112 1954 to 1. In the exercise of the amending jurisdiction over the date of 1946, the concurrent decision of the High Court and the orders passed by the two courts below were set out. And instructed the authorities to correct the date of birth error on the date of revision of the computerized National Identity Card but the circumstances allowed it.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
