DR. NAHEED FATIMA versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIR CORPORATION (PIAC) THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Section 2 (3), Scheduled First and Second Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11, called for relief of evacuation due to a plane suit accident to recover the casualties of passengers. Plane scope was refused when the scope of the Carriage of Air (International Convention) Act, 1966, independently of the things contained in the first schedule or to the extent of the carrier's liability, was refused. Will be responsible. It would not be fatal to justify appropriate relief on its own, and after a solitary case on such ground, the court cannot be dismissed if it can apologize to the plaintiff after the trial is over. Was entitled under the first schedule of the Act whether the amount claimed by the claimant was properly counted or completely dropped or any question beyond its scope as per the rules laid down in the earlier schedule of the Act. The reason can only be decided at the end of the trial rules
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
