Sections 497, 103 and 94 of the Narcotic Sub-Metals Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 6/9 (C), possession of drug paraphernalia, 20, 21, 22 and 25, were denied on the same grounds for refusal of a second bail application. Denied the bail. No new scope was available to the suspect. The same points could not be taken in the wake of new developments. Applying for the preparation of records regarding flight times does not bring the accused's case to further scrutiny. But when the trial court was examining evidence that there was sufficient material on record to prosecute the accused, no previous hostility or economic enmity was charged against the prosecutor for non-participation of private witnesses during the raid. The relevant sections 20, 21 and 25 were not complied with. The Control of Narcotic Materials Act 1997 and Section 103, CCP were deemed in fact and under the law. (f) 21, 21 and 22 of the Control of Narcotic Materials Act 1997, being a directory in nature and non-compliance will not make the trial / sentence invalid in the eyes of the law. Grant of bail; his application dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
