O XXXIX, Rr. 1 and 2 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Articles 12, 42 and 54 of the Interim Order, the grant of the Principal Court, the first liability of the terms and the plaintiff's complaint in the balance of convenience is that Bought its shares The company in question to the defendant but the defendant refused to transfer the shares in his name, a single judge of the High Court upheld the defendants in question regarding preventing them from creating a third party interest in the disputed shares of the company. Ordered to go (i) the first existence of the right to be the plaintiff and the first case in favor of the plaintiff or the plaintiff through its infringement. (ii) irreparable harm, loss or injury which may occur to the plaintiff, unless an injunction has been issued. (iii) The injunction against restraining the plaintiff will be relatively greater than that which is likely to arise from its approval or, in other words, the balance of convenience should be in favor of the plaintiff in this case only. Had to temporarily review. To see if there are three required conditions to support the plaintiff, the order is discretionary to exempt and it has to be approved by the court in accordance with the valid legal principles that the decision was to be made on the basis of the existence of this case or Based on that, the decision had to be made. The content of the record and the nature of such material at the time of the hearing of the injunction petition should be the nature of the evidence, considering that the court should have the opinion or in that case that the prohibition order should be applied for a subpoena. I was in all probability of succeeding by deciding in favor of the basic period of the trial, especially the civil jurisdiction.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
