Articles 409, 420, 468, 471 and 477 of the Convention evidence (Article 10), Article 129 Definition of evidence of criminal breach of trust, fraud, forgery, account discovery were in the German evidence chain record Turns out, a Dunk employee received a checkbook containing seven unused checks from the account holder, who came to close the account. Four months later, the accused went to meet the account holder and asked him to return the checkbook. And the account holder told her that she had already given him the checkbook. The account holder stated both aspects clearly in his statement and there was no question as to what was asked in his cross examination. The account holder stated that after signing, he advised the accused who sent the NIFT; and finally the person to whom the allegedly was sent, said that he had not received the same, All aspects of this were confronted and challenged during Article 129 of the Canon Shahadat, 1984, under which it was made mandatory that the court take over any entity. Natural phenomena, human behavior, and the general nature of public and private business are thought to have occurred when in fact, when the accused received a checkbook from the account holder and did not destroy or invalidate it. And then covers it. On the tracks, he meets the account holder after the fraud, things speak for themselves The culprit of the accused is sentenced
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
