Find a Lawyer

IMDAD HUSSAIN versus STATE

Sections 497 and 498 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 395 Duty Guarantee, Factors Determining Guarantee Grants Reduction of Bail Bond The defendant demanded a reduction in the amount of bail, because of the submission of the bail bond by the accused. For this he had no means. If there is no guarantee, the purpose of granting the reduced amount of bail will be defeated and the complainant had no objection to the reduction of the amount of bail. 000 has been reduced to 25,000 as it is the court's discretion to determine the circumstances and location of the accused. The bail amount was modified before the bail amount was approved before approving the bail amount accordingly the request was dealt with.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• UNITED BANK LIMITED v. PRESIDING OFFICER, BANKING COURT NO.2, KARACHI 2011 CLD 931
• Rana IMRAN v. FAHAD NOOR KHAN 2011 CLC 933
• ALI NAWAZ alias MUHAMMAD KHAN v. State 2011 MLD 933
• FEROZ KHAN BALOUCH v. FIRST WOMEN BANK LTD. through Attorney 2011 PCrLJ 936
• LIBERTY MILLS LIMITED AND LIBERTY ENERGY (PRIVATE) LIMITED 2011 CLD 944
• BANK AL-HABIB LTD. v. Mst. ZEHRA SARFRAZI 2011 MLD 944
• QURBAN ALI v. State 2011 YLR 946
• ALLAH JURIO alias JURIAL v. State 2011 PCrLJ 946

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

online advocate from Havelian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes