SIKANDAR A. KAREEM versus THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU
Section 9 (a) (i) to (xii) and 5 (d) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 265 K Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Corruption and Corrupt Practices Applicable Court Under Section 265 K / Defendant's requests denied. , The CCP suspect tried to end the pending proceedings in the National Accountability Bureau reference, alleging that he had forged property because the beneficiaries paid nominal costs while the accused company collected billions of rupees. After the government was in the process of resigning under the aegis, the withdrawal in lieu of false promises alleged that section 5 (d) and subsection (xii) of section 9 (a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, which " Partner "term and provided assistance and adaptation to the crime of corruption and corruption. After the adoption of 21 11 2002, respectively, no "partner" was made responsible for the punishment nor aid or assistance. ance corruption and `` methods of corruption \ 'to be punishable (front 16 11 1999 to 23 11 2002), therefore, the case of the accused was not covered when the accused against section 9 (2003) in section 5 (d). A legal reference was filed at the time of the amendment. And Section 9 (a) (xii) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, had already been made, with regard to counterfeiting, `fraud 'and large-scale public fraud in the case of liquid counterfeiting in relation to properties. Was paid. The order of the High Court's charges against the persons attracted by the provisions of Section 9 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, was continued during the civil litigation trial against the accused.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
