GUL MUHAMMAD HAJANO versus PROVINCE OF SINDH, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Sections 324/353/354/34 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 9 and 352 of Pakistan, Article 199 Assault, Contempt of Attack, Attack or Criminal Force Trying to prevent a civil servant from dealing with a woman with the intention of treating her responsibly, assaulting or criminalizing a woman. And the trial of a constitutional petition to the government in prison with arms, in the exercise of the powers conferred under section 9 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in 1898, during the jail trial of the accused petitioner, who was the father of the accused. Was reported, under which the government ordered the prosecution of the accused inside the jail on notification under the video. The petitioner (father) had insisted that his son / accused be entitled to open the case in the court and not in jail under the constitution and the law. The legitimate suspect was involved in 34 criminal cases and, considering the gravity of the crime against the accused and their detriment, it can be considered that on average one month per month under Section 354, PPC during the year 2009. More people were charged with modesty and sensational moods with women in the covert area of Karachi. An offshoot of the commission of the crime by robbery, earning and wearing valuable goods and cash from women has received a lot of scandal and attention from the press when it was printed on the record in any of the rallies led by the affected women. I was not charged and bail was not applied by the accused in any case and could not be ascertained. If, in any case, the accused had committed Section 6565 K
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
