QAMARUDDIN ARIAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRESIDENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN
Section 11 and O VII, R 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 39, 42 and 54 of the Suite Declaration, Contract Termination and Permanent Order of Army Land Cultivation, Contract Termination of Plaintiff's Contract by Authority and The High Court rejected the constitutional petition challenging such a private plaintiff's termination of his contract by authority, with the observation that the Authority as a plaintiff for the management of such land on an annual basis. Retained, and at the expiration of the contract, he lost the legal claim. Except for any other claim against the Authority for the breach of contract or for damages caused by it, for which it would invalidate the claimant's contract, cancel the contract awarded to the private defendant and In a preventive case, the civil court can approach the court. The power to create a third party's interest in the application of the Land Authority under O VII, Rule 11, CPC, was argued in the constitutional petition justifying the removal of the prohibited post from the theory of justice. And the trial was similar to the one on which the High Court had already declared its judicial decision as plaintiff so as to protect itself from the obstacles of the judiciary. The defendant had already said about the termination of his contract that after the expiry of the contract, the plaintiff had no legitimate right and lost his claim on such land, dismissing the plaintiff, in this case. I was the plaintiff's contractor's useless and vicious exercise with no argument because the plaintiff could not be granted relief against him, he could not be denied,
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
