THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, ISLAMABAD versus ASGHAR ALI DAHAR
Section 9 (a) (i) Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), Section 265 H&417 (2A) Demanding unlawful restitution against Brett, the trial court acquitted the accused, giving them the benefit of the doubt. The Trial Court After each of the five or five points was determined, the issues were discussed, reproducing the relevant sections of the evidence of the parties. And for his reasons, he found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the fraudulent money was conveyed to the complainant in the presence of the Judicial Magistrate Trial Court that the evidence of the prosecution witnesses related to the recovery and arrest. There are contradictions. The accused had made the matter doubtful and the benefit would come to the accused, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that both the accused had received fraudulent money from the complainant, the prosecution failed to prove beyond doubt. It was alleged that the accused had committed the crime. Section 9 (a) (i) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, the trial court appreciated the evidence and discussed it in detail in the judgment, no prejudice was made to the complainant nor the defendant's motive. There was an appeal against acquittal of the prosecution. Discard, in the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
