Section 561A & 173 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 380 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 14 householder's orders in theft of residence are guaranteed by the respondent / complainant. The accused is alleged to have visited. The complainant stayed with his family members and stayed with him overnight, but with the complainant's daughter early in the morning after the investigating officer closed the investigation and recorded the statements of the witnesses, the magistrate had to settle the matter. After submitting the report to him, he slipped with the investigating officer. \ C \ The Class Magistrate also did not accept it and directed the Investigation Officer to file a report against the accused under Section 173, CR PC, under which order the applicants / accused were requested under Section 555A. Was granted, CCP applicants married against their wishes. The complainant's daughter, the defendant / complainant was never found after the marriage, nor did the applicants or the survivors of the applicant's accused visit the complainant's residence after the marriage. It was only a matter of fact that the complainant was aware of the applicant's marriage, but in the FIR, he had hidden the fact that both the applicants / accused remained in police custody for three days, but it was stated that The alleged stolen goods were not recovered. A witness did not see the allegations in the FIR against the applicant as allegedly stealing articles and / and leaving the complainant's house to the applicants / accused. Bill
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
