Find a Lawyer

TAHIR ANEES versus CITI BANK N.A.

Section & & App 22 Applicants who were scheduled to make fixed payments requested the simplicity of the request that the markup amount could be substantially reduced depending on the difficulties it faced whenever a person If the mistake is made in fulfilling its legal and financial obligations, the bank or financial institution was entitled to receive and recover the money from the person. The decisions are made by looking at the facts and circumstances of the case where the banking court No justification was found to defy the order passed, no relief was found there. Only and only on compassionate grounds

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• PRIDE SCHOOL OF NURSING through Principal v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Health 2011 MLD 1053
• HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. v. VTH BANKING COURT AT KARACHI 2011 CLD 1056
• THE STATE/NAB through Chairman v. SIKANDAR ALI JATOI 2011 PCrLJ 1057
• GHULAMULLAH alias KARIRI v. State 2011 YLR 1058
• WASATULLAH JAFFRI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division/Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue 2011 PLC(CS) 1063
• Mst. GUL BANO v. ALLAH BACHAYO 2011 MLD 1067
• Mirza GHULAM MUJTABA v. KASB BANK LIMITED 2011 CLD 1072
• GHULAM SHABBIR v. State 2011 YLR 1074

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

solicitors from Timergara lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes