Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Qtal EM bail, the grant of principles of in-depth examination of evidence at the bail-out stage was not valid, nor was it a requirement of law, but the court temporarily Did not refrain from following. Evidence of witnesses, the recovery of weapons, medical evidence and other relevant evidence, if any, to decide whether the accused was connected to the commission of the crime, while questioning the bail. No need to enter while making a decision. Deep testimony and scrutiny of the evidence, however, could not be decided in space and the court had to look at the available material if the answer was positive, given the temporary opinion that the accused was previously associated with the commission. The crime of murder; or where the sentence provided was either death or life imprisonment, then the rule of refusing bail was granted, while the bail was also exempt, and the court had no way of assessing the value of the goods already placed. There was no restriction, there was no doubt that the accused was entitled to the benefit of the doubt even at the bail-out stage, but a thorough reading of the evidence and the law should be doubted. And this can be explained by the temporary evaluation of the material on the record. Each hypothetical question, which can be handled, simply does not make it a matter of further investigation, after which the answer can be found after the trial court has evaluated the evidence. In order to be released on bail, he must further demonstrate that there was no reasonable basis for believing that he had committed a crime against him and that there was a possibility of an inquiry, which in almost every criminal case.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
