Section 497 Narcotic Substance Control (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c), 2 (c), possession of drug paraphernalia, possession of drug paraphernalia according to the FIR. Prohibited chars, if not in their own capacity, are at least in the sense of section 2 (c) of the Control of Drug Substances Act 1997, a dispute over the ability of a partner to establish where marijuana was recovered and its Has not been captured. The accused cannot be looked at at the bail-out stage, especially when proving that the accused has a burden on him that is not an urgent matter, the supply of obtaining a warrant was legitimate, otherwise raiding Sections 20 and 21 of the Attempt Act could have been completely lost, but its strict prohibition was not fatal and the raid was not illegal. The EES was just as competent as any other independent witnesses and their testimony could not be ignored simply because of their employees, in which case a huge amount of charge of 379 5kg was allowed to pass the bail. That was not the case for the same. The accused, as mentioned in section 51 (2) of the Act, was arrested on the spot with a large quantity of marijuana bail, though the accused was denied the accused.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
