Find a Lawyer

JAVED AWAN versus STATE

Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), bail of 9595 Rob Robbery, denial of the accused, no doubt was not named in the FIR, but the accused was identified by the complaining party who was guilty of the crime. The witnesses were. The complaint by the complainant against the accused proved that the theft watch was also recovered from the accused and no reasonable explanation was given as to why the accused had escaped from the court, no case was made. ? For further investigation and temporarily there was no reasonable basis for believing that the defendant did not commit the alleged offense for bail, the bail was rejected.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• SHAHBAZ QALANDAR COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED through Chairman v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Cooperative Department 2011 CLC 783
• Haji RAHMAN ALI v. NAMDAR 2011 YLR 783
• MUNAWAR ALI PATHAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2011 PLC(CS) 785
• Miss. NAYAB v. State 2011 YLR 789
• SHAZ PACKAGES v. BANK ALFALAH LIMITED 2011 CLD 790
• Mst. DORIS THOMAS v. State 2011 MLD 793
• HABIB AHMED v. State 2011 PCrLJ 798
• GHULAM AKBAR v. JAHANGIR ALI 2011 MLD 803

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

advocate for immigration from Battagram lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes