Section 10 Defendants of the Banking Court Responsibility Documents to Defend This Case The Banking Court dismissed the leave to defend the petition filed by the defendants and in favor of the Bank Plaintiff created by the Defendants The verdict of the case was that in addition to raising various preliminary objections, he raised questions. The law but the Banking Court sought to justify defending the plea without appreciating the same dismissed leave, while deciding the leave to defend the plea, the heavy responsibility was placed on the Banking Court not only Appreciate the content of the plaintiff, but will also leave the request and copy to save. In order to pass a speech order with formal reasoning, it was necessary to examine the facts of the case and to consider the case documents as well as leave to defend the application and its transcript, deciding after the parties' full requests to the Banking Court. But it was necessary. In order to defend and dismiss the application, the question of the law raised or dismissed in a negligent and summary manner was the only opportunity for the defendants in the banking suit to apply for leave for defense and to fulfill them. The future relies on its decision, therefore, with all justice, the defendants had a legitimate right to be heard and all questions of law. And for the defense of the application, the facts raised in the leave should be answered to the Banking Court because upon the defense's dismissal, the defendants had to leave the field without further opportunity for judicial defense and the Banking Court By
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
