Section 526 Determination Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/148/149/114 Case of the transfer of Qatil Ahmed demanded for the complainant / applicant to withdraw the case from the court which was running the case and transfer to another court. Had a transfer request. The trial judge's attitude with them was extremely harsh and favorable for the accused. That the trial judge was compelling the applicant to plead guilty to the offender, failing which he would acquit the accused from all charges and that the accused was openly expressing the opinion of the trial judge and such The applicant had lost confidence in the judge in the situation. Who was the president of the court when a report was being sought, the trial judge said that all the allegations made in the petition were false, unreasonable, baseless and provocative. According to the report, the allegations were raised by the applicant, when all the evidence of the prosecution was completed, the case was in the terminal phase, in which case the petition was filed. While the accused was unnecessarily suffering, while deciding the petition for transfer, the court must consider that there was no injustice to anyone, it has become clear in the present case that the petition The case has been moved to adjourn and there is no substance transfer in the charges. From one court to another, a matter cannot be claimed as a matter of right or it cannot be approved as a normal matter. And the court to which the request for transfer was made, a
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
