Sections 6, 9 (c) and 29 of the Anti-Drug Forces Act (III of 1997), Sections 3 and 5 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), sections 103, 537 and 561 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199, and the constitutional jurisdiction of proceedings and Powers High Court challenged the proceedings through constitutional petition against Section 1 561A, CRPC scope for possession of narcotic drugs, etc., in the presence of the anti-drug force, to file an FIR with the local police and There is no authority to investigate the matter, which was allegedly legal. Is allegedly involved in a lawsuit filed under Sections 6 and 9 (c) of the Drug Control Act 1997, which carries a maximum sentence of death or life imprisonment; Cannot be concluded without a trial. The Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, it was held that the alleged offense is committed until, on the contrary, until section 103 is proved, two or more qualified in the area at the time of the search by the application of section 103. The legislature was excluded from the search by the Legislative Drug Subjects Act 1997 by the legislature to avoid the presence of respected residents in the rules / complexities. In section 103, the CCP will exclude the role of the local police from investigating intoxicants, disobeying the provisions of section 21 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act 1997, the High Court upheld Article 199 and Article 561 of the Constitution. , Had obtained sufficient powers to terminate proceedings under the CRPC. That the former were illegal or where the court came to a positive conclusion that the proceedings were in the form of a previous case, the non-judicial High Court
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
