Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SIRAJ versus STATE


Section 13 Possession of Illegal Weapons, Ability to Dismiss Appeal Only the trial court found guilty and convicted under Section 13 of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 Sessions Court (First Appeal Court) filed against the accused and sentenced Appeal dismissed. The reason for this is incomprehensible because the trial court had legally fulfilled the sentence already given to the accused, even when after the conviction of an accused, such appeal could not be resolved, and Only then should the decision be made. The affidavit of the sessions court was set aside on the merit and under the case, the sessions court was remanded that according to the law, further decision on the merit was resolved accordingly.

2015 P Cr. L J 133

[Sindh]

Before Amer Raza Naqvi, J

SIRAJ---Appellant

Versus

The STATE---Respondent

Criminal Revision Application No.54 and M.As. Nos.1762 and 1763 of 2013, decided on 29th October, 2014.

Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965)---

----S. 13---Possession of illegal weapons---Appeal, disposal of---Disposal of appeal on merits only---Trial Court convicted and sentenced accused under S.13 of Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965---Sessions Court (First Appellate Court) disposed of appeal filed by accused against his conviction and sentence for the reason that it had become infructuous as accused had already served out the sentence awarded to him by the Trial Court---Legality---Even after an accused had served out his sentence, appeal could not be disposed of on such ground, and same should have been proceeded and decided on merits---Impugned order of Sessions Court was set aside and case was remanded to the Sessions Court to be decided afresh on merits in accordance with law---Application was disposed of accordingly. Applicant Siraj produced in custody by Jail Authorities. Muhammad Iqbal Awan, APG for the State.

ORDER

AMER RAZA NAQVI, J.---

Applicant has been produced from Jail as he is detained in some other case. As observed in order dated 22-10-2014 this revision was filed against the order dated 20-9-2012 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Malir Karachi in Criminal Appeal No.3 of 2012. The appeal was disposed of by the learned Sessions Judge for the reason that applicant/appellant in that case already served out the sentence awarded to him by the trial Court. In my humble opinion even after serving the sentence appeal cannot be disposed of on this ground, it should have been proceeded and decided on merits. Learned Assistant Prosecutor-General also submits that learned Sessions Judge should have proceeded with the appeal on merits. Accordingly order impugned is set aside. Case is remanded back to the learned Sessions Judge, Malir, Karachi to decide Criminal Appeal No.3 of 2012 afresh on merits in accordance with law. This Revision Application stands disposed of. MWA/S-98/Sindh Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.